<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chart Room</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chartroom.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chartroom.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Changing Consumer &amp; Colleague Behaviour: Developing a Unified Approach Across the Customer Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.chartroom.uk/2016/01/changing-consumer-colleague-behaviour-developing-a-unified-approach-across-the-customer-journey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chartroom.uk/2016/01/changing-consumer-colleague-behaviour-developing-a-unified-approach-across-the-customer-journey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Cross]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer journey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organisational chnage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chartroom.uk/?p=1660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>INCONSISTENT ASSUMPTIONS A recent global survey of CEOs (1) highlights the unprecedented era of change that is reframing the relationships between customers and companies across the globe.  Meeting the needs of increasingly demanding consumers, fuelled by digital disruption is now bringing the focus closer to a better understanding of human behaviour and customer decision making. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.chartroom.uk/2016/01/changing-consumer-colleague-behaviour-developing-a-unified-approach-across-the-customer-journey/">Changing Consumer &#038; Colleague Behaviour: Developing a Unified Approach Across the Customer Journey</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.chartroom.uk">Chart Room</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>INCONSISTENT ASSUMPTIONS</strong></p>
<p>A recent global survey of CEOs (1) highlights the unprecedented era of change that is reframing the relationships between customers and companies across the globe.  Meeting the needs of increasingly demanding consumers, fuelled by digital disruption is now bringing the focus closer to a better understanding of human behaviour and customer decision making.  Recognition too perhaps that technology is an agent for behaviour change and not an end in itself- making an organisations grasp of the understanding the influences around behaviour a core issue for its success.</p>
<p>Personally speaking, it doesn’t take much degree of self analysis to realise that human behaviour is not as simple or as rational as we would like to believe.  But it is interesting that this obvious personal truth is not so clear in a business context.  All too often, plans (alongwith most economic forecasts) are still developed with underlying assumptions of ‘rational buyer’ behaviour laddering up to confident expectations of straight line growth.  This is despite recognising that technology has transformed traditional thinking around linear customer journeys to purchase and acknowledgement that the consumer is now ‘in control’.</p>
<p>The ‘rational man’ model was dismissed some time ago by academics as a poor explanation of actually how we make decisions.  The evidence base from across the various fields of psychology and related disciplines, now championed by the behavioural sciences, offers a very different reality.  We don’t have the mental space or time to weigh up the pros and cons of all the options we have for the multitude of decisions we face in our daily lives.  We take mental shortcuts that bias our decisions, often occuring at the sub-conscious level which results in our actual behaviour straying some distance away from what might be forecast by standard economic theory.</p>
<p>The networked society we are now in operates according to the rules of human rather than pure economic behaviour.  Whilst we recognise that a fundamental shift in the drivers of consumer behaviour has occurred, typically that emotional affinity is a fey factor in our our decision-making along with the influence of our peer networks who have superceded conventional organisations as the key source of trust and authority, we don’t delve deeper to explain why this is the case.By ignoring the evidence offered from psychology we are failing to grasp the fundamentals around human behaviour which are vital in the dual challenge of improving customer experience and aligning the actual behaviours of employees around it. In the time poor world and short termism of our own business decision making we are neglecting to apply some first principles of human behaviour.</p>
<p><strong>RE-FOCUSING ON BEHAVIOUR</strong></p>
<p>In my experience, the need to think more deeply about behaviour and how to influence it is obvious when seeking to address some of the harder challenges facing society.  For example, in the complex challenge to address obesity, a group of experts from across the disciplines developed the Obesity Systems Map, which using systems theory, mapped all the factors that contributed to the isssue (2).  Over 100 casual factors were identified operating at the personal, social and environmental levels and this explanation was used to develop interventions across sectors including the development of the government’s own Change4Life programme.  The map suggests that pressure across the whole system needs to be consistently applied by all sectors of society over time, suggesting that the current health focus on sugar intake will have limited impact unless it is part of a wider and prolonged integrated programme across the whole system.</p>
<p>The emergence of the behavioural sciences is not restricted to government and policy makers with its adoption growing in the private sector too &#8211; across industry sectors and across functions.  For example, Barclays have established a wealth management business based on behavioural finance (see https://www.investmentphilosophy.com/behavioural-finance/) and the technology companies such as Amazon are employing behavioural expertise.  Examples of marketing more formally embracing the thinking are increasing but examples remain too few and often too superficial.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, the diversity of adoption across the structures and disciplines of business points to the emergence of a lasting new tradition.  But there is a more immediate priority to systematically connect applications across the siloes and provide a unifying route to meet the challenge of shifting customer behaviours that, according to the PWC survey, is currently preoccupying global CEO’s.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>CREATING A NEW PICTURE AROUNG SHIFTING CUSTOMER &amp; COLLEAGUE JOURNEYS</strong></p>
<p>This offers a real competitive opportunity for organisations who apply an understanding of behavioural change to the customer journey – aligning both the customer experience and the organisation around human behaviour.  The outcome being an organisation that is tuned into the patterns of behaviour of both its’ customers and itself, and able to synchronise experiences through a shared picture of how behaviour works within fluid makets.</p>
<p>It is not new news that the customer journey is no longer linear but how well are we adaptinging to this reality?  Potential customers move at different stages and speeds through an iterative process of decision making, where associations are formed well ahead of entering a market and with active consideration supported by technology shaping new buying behaviour right up until the moment of purchase (E.g. the use of our smart phones before going in-store to check best local deals available).  The subsequent customer experiences are often shared across personal networks to create positive or negative endorsements in what McKinsey have termed ‘the loyalty loop’ (4).</p>
<p>But we are only partially sighted to the new dynamics at play and without a full picture of what is happening and <em>why</em>.  In particular, we are missing the hidden patterns of conscious and un-conscious influence as people build intention, interaction and experience across the stages of decision making in the marketplace.  There are numerous  models that explain various types of behaviour.  In general terms behaviour can be explained by factors working at four levels – namely personal, social and local/macro levels.  Harnessing these insights across the stages of the customer journey (see Diagram 1 below) will ensure that customer experience ‘goes with the flow’ of human behaviour.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chartroom.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/CustomerJourney.png"><img class=" wp-image-1654 aligncenter" src="http://www.chartroom.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/CustomerJourney-300x176.png" alt="CustomerJourney" width="402" height="236" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And the picture is not complete until matched with an equivalent view of your own organisation’s behaviour and capability to deliver success at every touchpoint on this new customer journey.</p>
<p>The effects we are looking to capture are multivariate and there is a significant role for behavioural analytics and ‘big data’ techniques here, but equally for a structured hypothesis and guiding framework on what is happening and what can be done to bring customers and organisations closer to create consistent value.</p>
<p><strong>CAPTURING THE FOUR LEVELS OF INFLUENCE ACROSS THE CUSTOMER JOURNEY</strong></p>
<p>There are essentially, four levels of influence on our decision making and formalising how behaviour works at each of these four levels will provide a new picture of behaviour for both consumers and colleagues, and reveal the hidden influences at play. Very briefly, these levels are:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Personal factors</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>These impact the individual and affect the choices and behaviours we undertake.  Whilst these embrace values, attitudes and beliefs they focus on the factors that over-ride our rational selves.  There are many biases that are well established such as ‘prospect theory’ established by Kahneman and Tversky (5), which demonstrates that ‘losses loom larger than gains’ whereby the fear of losing is at least twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining with the result that people are more willing to take a risk to avoid making a loss rather than a gain.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Social factors</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>These factors exist <em>beyond</em> the individual and act in a social context to influence behaviour.  ‘Network theory’ recognises that people are heavily influenced directly by what other people do and indirectly by our perceptions of what others would or should do.  Hence the power of peer to peer networks in spreading ideas and influence and the explosion of social media.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Local and wider macro factors</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>These also have a huge effect on <em>why</em> people do what they do.  They can constrain and shape behaviour including the macro factors of market conditions and available technology, as well as the physical conditions in which people live and work.  It also includes the more immediate situational context and moment of the decision.  One of the key behavioural factor here is defaults, where we go with the flow of the preset options which then guide our unconscious habits and routines.  Overcoming inertia is a key challenge for many markets with the financial and energy sectors obvious examples of where inertia presents the biggest barrier to change.</p>
<p>Typically in our planning we overestimate the conscious individual factors and under-estimate the social and local impacts and thereby make decisions based upon incomplete explanations of behaviour. But leveraging these factors for customers and colleagues in the right combination and sequence  will be key to their re-alignment.</p>
<p><strong>APPLYING THIS SYSTEMATICALLY TO CUSTOMERS AND COLLEAGUES</strong></p>
<p>Recognising the key behaviours and factors at play across the customer journey is the start point to redefining the customer experience, which is very likely to then  require process and behaviour change within the organisation to deliver the new service improvements. To enact that internal behaviour change, in a similar way to how you viewed the customer influences, you then have to consider what influences employee behaviour at a personal, peer, organisational level, to ensure a sustainable change through a common approach (see Diagram 2 below).</p>
<p><img class=" wp-image-1653 aligncenter" src="http://www.chartroom.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/UniversalApproach-300x213.png" alt="UniversalApproach" width="382" height="271" /></p>
<p>So developing a unified view of customer and colleague behaviours across the customer journey offers a route to informing the internal change in behaviour required  to ensure sustainable change and a better customer experience.  A four-step approach makes this a practical reality which can be readily validated through a testing programme.  Without the dual focus on customers and colleagues as  a constant, the risk is that the intent for greater customer focus remains just that.  But get the dual focus right, and the benefits can be profound.</p>
<p>Mark Cross</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>PwC Annual Global CEO Survey ‘<em>A Marketplace without Boundaries? Responding to Disruption</em>’ (<a href="http://www.pwc.com/ceosurvey">pwc.com/ceosurvey</a>).</li>
<li>Vandenbroeck, J. Gossens and M.Clemens (2007) ‘<em>Tackling Obesities: Future Choices-Building the Obesity Systems Map</em>’ www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/295154/07-1179-obesity-building-system-map.pdf</li>
<li>‘<em>The Consumer Decision Journey</em>’ McKinsey &amp; Co (June 2009) <a href="http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/marketing_sales/the_consumer_decision_journey">http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/marketing_sales/the_consumer_decision_journey</a></li>
<li>‘<em>Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty</em>” (Tversky &amp; Kahneman (1992) Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5</li>
</ol>
<p>This article is extracted from the article published in the OE journal in January 2016.</p>
<p>For the full journal see   <a href="http://www.oecam.com/the-oe/getting-even-closer-to-the-customer/">http://www.oecam.com/the-oe/getting-even-closer-to-the-customer/</a>.</p>
<p>OeCam is a boutique firm of consultants who help maximise the effectiveness of individuals,teams and organisations.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.chartroom.uk/2016/01/changing-consumer-colleague-behaviour-developing-a-unified-approach-across-the-customer-journey/">Changing Consumer &#038; Colleague Behaviour: Developing a Unified Approach Across the Customer Journey</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.chartroom.uk">Chart Room</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chartroom.uk/2016/01/changing-consumer-colleague-behaviour-developing-a-unified-approach-across-the-customer-journey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is positive business?</title>
		<link>http://www.chartroom.uk/2014/10/positive-business-partnerships/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chartroom.uk/2014/10/positive-business-partnerships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Cross]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chartroom Viewpoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chartroom.dev/?p=1222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.chartroom.uk/2014/10/positive-business-partnerships/">What is positive business?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.chartroom.uk">Chart Room</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="section-normal " style=""><div class="row blox-row "><div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-12 col-md-12 col-lg-12"><div class="blox-column-content" style=""><div class='blox-element blox-element-text   ' data-animate='none'><h3 class="element-title">New partnerships between brands and society offer powerful routes to “good business” for all, but only if conflicting organisational behaviours are realigned.</h3>
<p>In many circumstances we are all now much more likely to place our trust in a friend of a friend of someone we’ve once met (virtually), than we are in government, a major multinational – or, heaven forbid &#8211; a politician.<br />
Everyone can recognise this shift, which is pushing societal trends to move away from institutions and towards personal, friendship and community peer networks. This shift is a major driver of transformational change at an individual, business and organisational level and forms a ‘mega trend’ which is having a major impact across business, brands and society. Inescapably we all now find ourselves part of what’s been called the “age of emotional proximity.”<br />
Rich opportunity for sustainable outcomes and “Good business for everyone” springs from these changes, but only if we can successfully realign commercial goals. Financial strategy needs to be reframed within a wider context, incorporating the objectives of society, civic partners and the media. Perhaps most crucially, people and their networks must always be at the core of this approach.<br />
Without taking these steps now, companies will become less relevant, face increasingly uncertain futures and they will almost inevitably suffer declining performance.<br />
Some are ahead of the game. Earlier this year the Chief Executive of Unilever, Paul Polman, called for capitalism to evolve based on long-term thinking. He re-iterated several of the key themes that Unilever have been following for some time. The corporation seeks to double its turnover over ten years whilst reducing absolute environmental impact and – crucially &#8211; by increasing positive social impact.<br />
And Unilever is not alone. Mark Carney, the Bank of England governor also warned that capitalism is at risk of destroying itself, unless the banking sector realise they have an obligation to create a fairer society:<br />
&#8220;Just as any revolution eats its children, unchecked market fundamentalism can devour the social capital essential for the long-term dynamism of capitalism itself. To counteract this tendency, individuals and their firms must have a sense of their responsibilities for the broader system.&#8221; (Source Guardian 28th May 2014).<br />
We see new strategic partnerships across the public and private sectors as a keystone to the delivery of positive business. Wider social benefits provide a common basis for collaboration and if harnessed effectively, they form the basis of shared “good business” for all the participants. Partnerships can exist at an organisational; brand; programme or campaign level and we show in our case study section how we have helped create a powerful partnership programme for engaging youth through music &#8211; with The Big Music Project. But effective partnerships are not without their challenges. They need to be strategically matched and specified based upon an open and transparent understanding of the respective business incentives at play.We have an approach for achieving this match and encouraging the full participation of all partners in what we term “positive partnerships”.<br />
Cause-related marketing has long since demonstrated the power of positive partnerships from which many mainstream businesses and brands can learn. We admire the work of organisations like Cancer Research and their consistent leadership in this area &#8211; marshalling many of the key elements, bringing together communities, media, business and charity interests around a powerful and shared cause that holds the prospect for “good business” for all the participants. (for example see http://www.standuptocancer.org.uk ). The recent phenomenon that was the “ice bucket challenge” and the incredible fundraising feats of Stephen Sutton for Teenage Cancer Trust also indicate how the model of giving is evolving.<br />
Perhaps most importantly, trust in companies is built upon consistent business purpose and actual brand behaviours and in the connected world in which we now live, conflicting organisational behaviours simply have no hiding place left. But the leadership of many organisations refuses to accept this plain truth. Despite inspiring practice and admirable commitment from companies such as Unilever, M&amp;S and Kingfisher Group, to date only a minority of businesses have fully committed to “positive business” in this way. Others are surely set to follow.<br />
As Paul Polman says: “Corporate social responsibility and philanthropy are very important, and I certainly don’t want to belittle them. But if you want to exist as a company in the future, you have to go beyond that. You actually have to make a positive contribution. Business needs to step up to the plate.”</p>
<p>We will be looking to highlight positive business behaviours in this blog over the forthcoming months so please do contribute and let us know where you see inspiring examples.</p></div></div></div></div></div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.chartroom.uk/2014/10/positive-business-partnerships/">What is positive business?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.chartroom.uk">Chart Room</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chartroom.uk/2014/10/positive-business-partnerships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>184</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
